
Why do we offer
multiple vendors of CompactFlash?
All of our CompactFlash meets the standards set forth by the CompactFlash Association. This means that they are 100% compatible with any device that supports the CompactFlash Association Standards. Sandisk invented the CompactFlash. They and Microtech supply much of the CompactFlash to OEMs. All are quality products.
Most CompactFlash are manufactured using similar technology and materials. The major difference between the chips are:
1) the ATA controller software
2) the silicon chip manufacturer
3) marketing.
The Hitachi C-4 controller is the faster controller (10 MB/s burst vs 4-6 MB/s burst for the Viking), so the read/write speed is faster. This is an advantage in applications such as digital photography, where the speed to capture an image can be critical, or in PDA applications with intensive read/write operations such as database searching, data transfers, etc. The faster controllers cost the manufacturers more, and this is reflected in the price of the chip.
Not all CompactFlash using the Hitachi C-4 controllers have the same speed. SimpleTech uses Hitachi C-4 controllers, but their speed is only 80 - 90 % that of the Microtech CFs. The reason? They buy the silicon from another manufacturer and put the Hitachi controllers on them.
Since SimpleTech started using the Hitachi controllers, most of the compatability issues with their CompactFlash has been eliminated. Early on, d-store test marketed SimpleTech CompactFlash and found an unacceptably high incompatability rate with many digital devices. At the time SimpleTech was using Lexar controllers. Now, with the Hitachi controllers, we find SimpleTech CompactFlash (with the exception of a few configurations which we do not market) to be suitable for our customers. Regardless of the issues, you can be assured that if you buy a CompactFlash from d-store, we will stand behind the product.
All CF chips are manufactured with the same number of memory cells. But as with most memory chips, not all the cells are functional. The ATA software manages the memory: identifying defective cells and skipping over them during normal operation. The most amazing thing is that this is managed on a cell-by-cell basis as opposed to a sector basis with conventional ATA hard drives. So, the memory utilization for CompactFlash is more efficient. The controller software also occupies some of the total memory and precludes it from being available for other applications. The difference in reported size between the manufacturers is mostly marketing. We've tested several of the 30 MB and 32 MB CF in our Psion 5 and on DOS. In all cases, the reported available memory was between 31 MB and 32 MB. You could not tell from the available memory reported which chip was which. The Microtech, SimpleTech, and Sandisk 32 MB chips are nominally 32 MB before the controller is installed: the average chip will report 32 MB, but some could be more or less.
There is an enormous amount of misinformation on the Internet regarding the published specifications of these and other CompactFlash. This is partly because the specifications change as manufacturing techniques change. Also the ATA controllers used by the manufacturers have changed over time. The manufacturers are always looking to improve their product price/performance ratio. This is a rapidly evolving technology. What was true yesterday may not be true today. We try to publish the manufacturers certified specifications on our website. But sometimes, the manufacturer will change their specs without notifying the public. Part of the problem is also that the manufacturers publish specifications that are measured using different procedures. So, it is like trying to compare apples and oranges.
We recently ran some benchmark tests comparing the performance of the Viking 32 MB CompactFlash and the Microtech/Hitachi 30 MB CompactFlash in a Psion Series 5.
| Viking 32 MB | Microtech 30 MB | |
| Format Time | 10 min 45 sec | 3 min 5 sec |
| Size Reported | 31 MB | 31 MB |
In summary, both chips are quality products with high reliability and functionality. They both have about the same amount of memory. The 30 MB chip is faster than the 32 MB chip. At last report, the 30 MB chip also consumes slightly less power than the 32 MB chip. This can result in improved battery life. Are you going to see the difference? It depends on your application. Is the price difference worth it? That is a personal decision. The important thing is that you have a choice! You can decide which is best for you, based on your needs.
Appendum 1.
Jim Hawk recently wrote a Special Article on Digital Camera Film for the Washington Post (2 Oct 98).
In it he states "some memory cards save pictures faster than others, a speed difference of as much as eight seconds per shot. A quick comparison of CompactFlash cards on a Nikon Coolpix 900 camera showed a definite speed difference, with Lexar and Microtech cards leading the pack, followed by SanDisk, Kingston and Viking. "
Our experience with the 30 MB and 32 MB products bear out his observations. Microtech was by far the fastest. SanDisk was less than two-thirds as fast. Viking was less than one-third as fast. We did not include the Lexar or Kingston products in these tests.
3-17-99
Latest tests show the Microtech with the C4 controller being the fastest CompactFlash
available. SimpleTech is second. Lexar is third. Sandisk is fourth..
45MB CompactFlash is a different story. We could find no difference between the speed of the Microtech 45MB and the Viking 45MB CompactFlash. The transfer rates of the 45 MB were fast, but not as fast as the 30 MB Cards. Until that is, Microtech introduced their new C4 controller.
| Viking 45 MB |
Microtech 45 MB |
Microtech 48 MB w/C4 |
Sandisk 48 MB |
SimpleTech 48MB w/C4 |
|
| Format Time | 6 min 20 sec | 6 min 20 sec | 3 min 44 sec | 10 min | 4 min 18 sec |
| Size Reported | 45.8 MB | 45.8 MB | n/a | 45.8 | 47 MB |
The Sandisk formatted in 7 min 8 sec after the inital format. Sandisk attributes this to their intelligent controller.
Microtech just announced their new Hitachi C4 controller on Feb 12, 1999. This technology increases the speed of their cards. The sustained write speed of the new cards now boasts a 200% performance advantage over the industry's leading brand. We tested a new C4 controller on the 48MB CompactFlash. It is truly incredible. The results are added to the table in Appendum 2.
d-store is currently shipping the C4 on the 16, 32, and 48 MB cards.
Wow! We just tested the Microtech 8MB CF with the new C4 Controller. The format time was 28 seconds. Can't wait for this product to begin shipping.
The SimpleTech 128MB CF with the Hitachi C4 controller formats in 13 min.
Curious how the Nikon 990 works with different CompactFlash?
Click here.
© Copyright 1998-2000 ddynamics.
All Rights Reserved.